MicroLED intellectual property activity is growing exponentially both in terms of patents and topics. BOE has overtaken Apple, and China and traditional display makers are now in the lead.
- Fully updated intellectual property landscape: more than 4x more patent families, with 1900 new ones, and 3x more players, with more than 200 new ones, compared to the 2018 study
- Identify new players and new technology trends
- New technology segments analyzed: tiling for modular displays and driving
Key features of the report
- Extensive excel database of over 2400 patent families with hyperlinks to information including original documents, abstracts and assignees
- IP leadership, newcomers and key trends
- Portfolio strength ranking by technology node, including chip design, transfer and defect management
- IP collaboration networks between players
- Time evolution of patents filings by company, countries, technology node and company type
Objectives of the report
- High level industry and intellectual property trends: including timeline, geographic trends, shift in leadership, emerging players and organization types
- Identify leaders and emerging players in microLED intellectual property
- Leadership per region and company type including display makers, OEMs, equipment makers, startup, academics
- IP leadership and portfolio strength of leading companies, and their technology/application focus
- Deep insights into the status of microLED display technologies, identifying trends for each technology node and emerging technologies
- Identify IP collaborations between various organizations
Table of content
Methodology and terminology 13
Executive summary 26
Introduction to microLED displays 54
Intellectual property in China 69
- Trends in patent applications per country
- What is happening?
- Quality and strength of Chinese IP
MicroLED IP landscape overview 78
- Time evolution of patent applications & publications by: Country of filing, company HQ, company type
- Leading players per region, Company type
Company analysis 109
- Top 25 company portfolio technology cegmentation
- Main applicant ranking and legal status
- IP leadership, patent portfolio strength index, IP blocking potential, average age of leading players patent portfolio
- IP transfers, collaborations and partnerships
Leading company overview 134
- AU Optronics
- China Star (CSOT)
- Samsung: QD-OLED vs QNED and microLED.
- eLUX / Sharp
- Hon Hai – Foxconn Group
Technology segmentation 165
- Overview of patent families per technology node
Transfer and interconnect 169
- Time evolution
- Portfolio size vs. Strength index
- IP leadership and blocking potential
- Laser assisted transfer and assembly
- Elastomer, PDMS
- Self-assembly: Ultrasonic, magnetic fields etc.
- Vacuum or fluid/Gas micro-displacement
- New concepts
- Die attach
Pixel and display architecture 216
- Strength index of patent portfolio, IP leadership and blocking potential
- Other inorganic micro-emitters
- Antennas and RF coupling
Monolithic microdisplays 240
- Strength index, IP leadership and blocking potential
- Monolithic integration
- New entrants
- Architectures for RGB microdisplays including stacked, staggered and coplanar
Chip structure and manufacturing 264
- Portfolio strength index, IP leadership and blocking potential
- efficiency, current confinement structures
- RGB chips
- Structure for transfer and assembly optimization
- Samsung’s QNED
Light extraction and shaping 282
- Timeline, portfolio strength index, IP leadership and blocking potential
- Pixel and array level light management
- Distributed bragg reflectors
- Other light management, die shaping, liquid crystal etc.
Backplanes and driving 300
- Portfolio strength index, IP leadership and blocking potential
- TFT, microDriver ICs, smart pixels and alternative driving Schemes
Defect management and repair, testing 315
- Timeline, portfolio strength index, IP leadership
- Redundancy, repair
Color conversion 333
- Portfolio strength index and IP leadership
- Timeline, portfolio strength and IP leadership
- Discussion: Signal routing
Sensors and others in display components and functions 345
- Timeline, portfolio strength and IP leadership
- Touch and fingerprint
- Others: Including display cameras and 3D sensing
CHINA AND DISPLAY MAKERS DRIVE EXPONENTIAL GROWTH IN MICROLED IP
This new Yole Développement (Yole) report identifies close to 5,500 patents representing about 2,500 families filed by more than 350 different organizations. The level of activity is growing exponentially, with 40% of the patents filed in 2019 alone!
The growth is fueled by the meteoric rise of Chinese companies. This mirrors a more general trend in the country as it transitions from a manufacturing to an innovation-driven economy. This also reflects the situation in the display industry where Chinese companies now hold close to 50% of the worldwide display capacity in 2020.
Many of these microLED patents are questionable but established players shouldn’t underestimate their Chinese competitors. Some patents show world-class innovation and demonstrate a strong resolve to close the gap with established rivals. In addition, in high volumes, even low quality patents can be used as bargaining tools to fend off infringement lawsuits and negotiate cross licensing agreements. The proliferation of subpar patents may however hinder innovation as it increases barriers to entry.
Increasing resources are required to conduct freedom-to-operate analysis, monitor patent activities, try to invalidate wrongly granted patents, and respond to infringement lawsuits.
Companies are jumping on the microLED bandwagon for fear of being left out. Display makers dominated IP activity in 2019. Most were initially dismissive of microLEDs but all are now accelerating their effort. BOE now leads in volume with close to 150 new patent families in 2019 alone. LG, AUO, Samsung, CSOT, Tianma, Innolux, CEC Panda, Visionox and Foxconn group companies all dramatically increased activity as well. Korean companies are investing massively in OLED but microLED are a credible alternative for high end TVs. Chinese makers are behind on OLED, so microLED could be a differentiating play. For companies that haven’t invested in OLED, microLED could be critical for survival and allow them to remain relevant in various high-end market segments without requiring OLED-like multi-billion dollar capital expenditure.
Many companies now have broad portfolios. Licensing and legal battles will likely arise if microLED displays enter volume manufacturing. Except for microdisplays, where the capex-intensive steps can be outsourced, startups and small companies are not planning to become display makers. Rather, most will focus on their core expertise and attempt to license their technology to established display makers and OEMs.
MASS TRANSFER STILL DOMINATES ACTIVITY BUT THE RISE IN OTHER TECHNOLOGY
NODES SHOWS INDUSTRY MOVING FROM PROTOTYPES TO CONSUMER DISPLAYS
The overall level of creativity and the diversity of approaches being deployed to address microLED displays technology and manufacturing roadblocks is impressive and keeps increasing.
MicroLED displays for consumer applications won’t materialize until robust, high yield, low cost of ownership transfer & assembly processes are available. Elastomer micro-printing and MEMS-based processes continue spreading. An increasing number of detach mechanisms rely on lasers. There is a regained interest in self-assembly, vacuum processes and new concepts such as optical tweezers are emerging. Efforts on chip structures focus on improving efficiency, designing structures suitable for mass transfer and creating RGB monolithic chips which could reduce complexity in assembly.
More than 20 companies have now presented microLED display prototypes but more effort is needed to reach the quality and manufacturability required for consumer displays. As confidence increases that the mass transfer and chip efficiency conundrums could be resolved, the effort is accelerating on topics previously seen as “second order” issues. These include light extraction and shaping, driving, display designs as well as solutions to increase manufacturability, yield and reduce cost. Efficient yield management and repair strategies are as critical as mass transfer to enable microLED displays. Yet, efforts in those areas are still limited. In many cases however, companies are advancing on the topic but not filing IP in order to protect trade secrets.
SAMSUNG PURSUES MULTIPLE DEVELOPMENT TRACKS, APPLE SLOWS DOWN AND STARTUPS REMAIN A MAJOR INNOVATION FORCE
In order to compete with LG’s white OLED and maintain its leadership in the high-end TV market segment, Samsung Display Co. (SDC), announced a $11b investment to develop and manufacture Quantum Dot (QD)-OLED by 2021-2022. But Samsung is edging its bets. At CES, its Visual Display group showed impressive 75” to 150” microLED TV prototypes built using in-house mass transfer and chips developed by Playnitride. SDC however has a separate microLED development track: since 2016, it has focused its effort on nanorod microLED, referred to as “QNED”, initially developed by PSI Co., and Kookmin University. QNED can be assembled by fluidic self-assembly with inkjet printing tools. The technology would therefore be largely compatible with the manufacturing infrastructure deployed for QD-OLED while solving one of its major issue, the low efficiency of blue OLED emitters. QNED could blend microLED into more established display technologies.
“Historical” players such as X-Celeprint, or, more recently, Playnitride also remain very active. They have developed broad portfolios covering a wide range of microLED technology nodes. Glo and VueReal have also more than quadrupled the size of the portfolio since 2018. Activity has accelerated at Facebook after it acquired mLED and InfiniLED. Its recent exclusive licensing and manufacturing deal with Plessey confirms its ambitions for augmented reality applications. IP filing at Sony has stalled despite the commercialization of its microLED based Public Information Display. More surprisingly, activity at Apple has also slowed down significantly since 2017. The few patents it has since published however show the high level of maturity and advancement reached by the company in microLED display technologies. Apple has also expanded the scope of its effort into developing microdisplays for augmented reality. Overall, the reduced activity could also be a sign of confidence in an already robust microLED portfolio as the company now focuses on executing and setting up its supply chain. If successful, Apple would be the first to disrupt the industry by having developed its own display technology and establishing a mostly fabless supply chain model, something that Huawei could be willing to emulate.
Interface Solution, Glo, Globalfoundries, Goertek, Google / X Development, Guangdong U. Of Technology, Gwangju Inst. Of Science & Tech., HC Semitek, Himax, Hisense, Huawei, Huazhong U. Of Science & Tech., IBM, Innolux, Intel, ITRI, Jade Bird Display, Japan Display, Junwan Microelectronic, KAIST, KIMM, Konka, Kookmin University, KOPTI, Korea Advanced Nano Fab Center, Kyocera, LG, Lightizer, Lumens, Lumileds, Mikro Mesa, Nanchang University, Nanjing University, Nationstar, Nth Degree, Optovate, Osram, Ostendo, Playnitride, Point Engineering, Prilit Optronics, Psi Corp, Qisda, QMC, Rohinni, Samsung, Sanan, Seoul Semiconductor, Seoul Viosys, Elux, MTC, Shenzhen Sitan Technology, ShineOn, Sony, Sun Yat-Sen University, Sustech, Syndiant, Tianma, Toray Engineering, Tsinghua University, Ultra Display Technology, Unimicron, U. Of Hong Kong, V Technology, Visionox, Vitrolight, Vuereal, X-Celeprint/X-Display, and more.
Related Reports & Monitors
Status of the Memory Industry 2020
Market & Technology
Smartphone 3D Sensing Modules Comparison 2020
Reverse Costing - Structural, Process & Cost Report
Need to discuss?
We are open for discussionContact us